Dublin pride-A littery
rebuttal
Last month's Canadian
Vindicator e-zine
linking Ireland and
Canada carried an item
on Dublin, the Irish
capital, headed "When
it comes to litter,
we're number one!"
It stemmed from the
findings of study commissioned
by IBAL, Irish Business
Against Litter.
The item has drawn the
following response from
a constant reader whose
ire was aroused and
whose pride in Dublin
was offended.
"I want to pick
you up on the subject
of my greatly loved
"dirty Dublin"
and the subject
of litter. I know
that figures can't
lie, but liars can
figure, and the
picture you paint
does not reflect
the reality on the
ground here.
I would challenge
anyone to say that
Dublin is a dirty
city. OK, there
are areas like the
Liberties which
have been historically
amongst the dirtiest
areas imaginable,
but the city today
is a credit to the
City Fathers and
the Corporation
staff. It is a pleasure
to walk from Leeson
Street to Dorset
Street and see flowers
colour the neat
pavements, and street
lighting picking
up the beauty of
the architecture
at night.
Even in places like
Moore Street and
the Markets area,
adequate refuse
collection keeps
the smells and waste--with
which I grew up--a
distant memory.
The River Liffey
through the city
smells as sweet
as when it flows
past my garden fifteen
miles upstream,
and the Board Walk
in the city centre
provides a new and
exciting location
for the young and
the old to stroll
in a most continental
manner.
One very simple decision
by the government
to put an exorbitant
tax on plastic bags
has been the most
decisive factor
in the cleaning
of city streets
and even more so
of the countryside,
where hedgerows,
for years festooned
with multicoloured
plastic bags, are
once again blooming
in their pristine
beauty.
Over the past year
I have visited,
London, Edinburgh,
Birmingham, York,
New York, Baltimore,
Cleveland, Washington,
and it is my belief
that "dear
old dirty Dublin"
is not alone cleaner
but more beautiful
than any or all
of them."
The Vindicator
is happy to publish
this rebuttal, coming
as it does from a former
first lady of the capital.
Civic pride is to be
lauded. As an aid in
encouraging ongoing
measures to rid the
streets of unsightly
litter it can work wonders,
vide the Tidy
Towns contest which
has been hailed as one
of the most imaginative
and worthwhile projects
ever undertaken in support
of Irish tourism.
Our correspondent does
acknowledge that Dublin
is an expensive city
in which to live. Her
e-mail concludes:
"The cost of
living is, however,
a nightmare. Our
young increasingly
have to remain under
the parental roof
as the cheapest
apartment in the
city can cost almost
a quarter of a million
euros to buy, and
up to 1,200 euros
a month to rent."
To think that once upon
a time one could rent
a flat at 99 St. Stephen's
Green for £3 a
week, the figures quoted
are staggering!
A quick follow-up to
the story on litter
came in the middle of
July when Ireland's
Environment Minister
Martin Cullen announced
plans to place a special
litter tax on chewing
gum, polystyrene fast-food
wrappers and, surprisingly,
ATM receipts.
According to media reports,
a 5c to 10c levy is
to be imposed on every
pack of chewing gum,
similar to the levy
already imposed on the
use of plastic bags
which, as stated in
the e-mail above, "has
been the most decisive
factor in the cleaning
of city streets and
even more so of the
countryside, where hedgerows,
for years festooned
with multicoloured plastic
bags, are once again
blooming in their pristine
beauty."
The money generated will
be placed in a special
environment fund and
distributed to local
authorities to meet
the cost of cleaning
streets.
By levying the special
tax at point of sale,
consumers will pay upfront
for the expense of removing
their discarded wrappers
from public thoroughfares.
To Canadian readers the
inclusion of ATM receipts
in the scheme will come
as a surprise. Here
users of ATM machines
are cautioned about
the danger of throwing
away such receipts which
may provide valuable
information to others.
Anyone daft enough to
throw away their receipts,
instead of depositing
them in the receptacle
provided, is inviting
theft.
--30--
Home
| About
| Canadian Vindicator
| Literature
| Gallery
| History
|