The Canadian Electoral System
In an article on the Canadian
electoral system in our first issue on August 1, 2001, we
treated with this subject in the following passage:
Recently Canadians filled out their forms for the 2001 census.
We were obliged to do so by law. Penalties await those who did
not perform this mandatory civic duty.
Which is more important, a census or a General Election? Both
are important, but why make participation in one mandatory and
not in the other?
This is a matter that we will return to in future issues of
The Canadian Vindicator.
Six months on, in January, 2002, Jean-Pierre Kingsley, Canada's
Chief Electoral Officer, rejected the suggestion that voting be
made mandatory for general elections in Canada.
In an interview with Ottawa Citizen reporter Chris Cobb, Kingsley
stated:
"The federal government has rejected calls for a system
similar to that in Australia where eligible voters are fined if
they don't cast a ballot", adding that fining people for
not voting has no place in Canada's electoral system. "It
is an idea that has died," he concluded.
Whoa! Listen up, Mr. Kingsley! Ideas don't die just because you
say so. The struggle for electoral reform in Canada cannot be
confined by dismissing so peremptorily the suggestion that our
civic duty to vote cannot be made mandatory because at present
"it has no place" in the Canadian electoral system.
Citizens have a civic duty to vote, and duty carries with it
responsibility. Almost 40% of Canadians did not fulfill their
duty in 2001 general election. They shirked their responsibility.
True, contrarians may say they were exercising their freedom
not to vote, but freedom from carrying out a civic duty all other
citizens perform, and perform freely, should carry a penalty.
What the nature of that penalty might be is a matter for examination
and debate. It does not necessarily have to be fiscal, as in the
case of a fine for a traffic offence. It is not beyond the competence
of the bureaucracy to devise an appropriate penalty. And even
if it should take the form of a $25 or $50 fine, added as tax
or deducted from rebates and benefits, consider the accrual to
the national exchequer. For every million non-voters, $25 million
or $50 million would be realized, a sum not to be sniffed at in
these times of rising government expenditures.
What is important to remember is that almost 40% of eligible
voters did not fulfill their civic duty in 2001 in Canada.
Mr. Kingsley deserves commendation for putting forward the idea,
not "dead" but impractical, of allowing eligible voters
to cast their ballots in general elections via the Internet when
secure identification of individual voters can be established.
Personation via cyber space is all too easy at present. Allowing
voters to vote via telephone at a recent political party leadership
convention provoked charges of widespread manipulation.
If Australians see wisdom in making voting at general elections
mandatory, why, oh why, can't Canadians? Use the Internet to let
your Members of Parliament know
what you think.
Home
| About
| Canadian Vindicator
| Literature
| Gallery
| History
|