Security within Parliament
Porous and Ineffective
Yet another intruder
infiltrated Parliament
Buildings in Ottawa
scarcely a year after
expanded security measures
were announced by the
Board of Internal Economy
following the September
2001 terrorist attacks
in New York and Washington.
This time the "gentleman"
involved (yes, that
is how he was described)
made his way undetected
into the Centre Block's
old Reading Room, filled
with dignitaries present
"by invitation
only" at the unveiling
of the official portrait
of the Right Hon. Brian
Mulroney, who was Prime
Minister of Canada for
the nine years 1983
to 1992. In attendance
were Mr. Mulroney's
family, and two other
Canadian Prime Ministers,
one former and one present,
the Right Hon Joe Clark
and the Right Hon Jean
Chrétien.
The gentleman even got
onto the dais on which
Mr. Mulroney stood,
passing by Mr. Chrétien
in the process, without
being apprehended. Televised
pictures showed he was
in his shirt sleeves
and not wearing a jacket.
How was it allowed to
happen?
Earlier he had sat in
one of the open public
galleries overlooking
Members in the Chamber
itself.
Realizing from personal
experience the tragedy
which could have taken
place, I feel it incumbent
to republish the following
excerpts from an article
which appeared on this
web site in November
2001:
"As one whose
service in the House
of Commons spanned
three disparate
attempts to inflict
death and destruction
on its Members,
staff, and people
in the public galleries
of the Commons Chamber,
the publisher of
www.vindicator.ca
expresses unqualified
support for all
necessary preventive
measures consistent
with open democracy.
Former parliamentary
authorities balked
at the one remaining
step that should
be taken to shield
those whose duty
requires their attendance
in the Commons Chamber.
It is time to consider
once again the installation
of what is generally
termed bullet-proof
glass panels in
the Chamber itself.
If done tastefully,
their appearance
would present no
obstacle to the
right of the public
to see and to hear
their representatives
talking, debating,
questioning, and
acting like jackasses
whenever the mood
strikes them.
Such a measure was
undertaken in the
United States Congress
during the presidency
of Harry Truman,
following a gun-firing
terrorist attack.
It is time a similar
step be taken to
protect Canada's
parliamentarians."
The article gave details
of the three incidents
mentioned. For anyone
interested it is accessible
at Parliamentary
Security.
Before some other gentleman
intruder takes advantage
of the porous and ineffective
measures now in place,
highly dependent as
they are on mechanical
screening and surveillance,
and which were reportedly
strengthened only last
year, the caution is
again advanced that:
"It is time to consider
once again the installation
of what is generally
termed bullet-proof
glass panels in the
Chamber itself."
It may be of interest
to note that there is
quite a history of objects
being thrown from the
public and official
Galleries on to the
floor of the Commons
Chamber. These were
usually covered by an
editorial notation in
Hansard.
August 24, 1964, page
7177, as the Hon
George Nowlan was
speaking in the famous
Flag debate:
"I support the
proposal for a plebiscite
because I believe.
sir, in this matter-"
[Editor's Note: And
an object having
been thrown from
the gallery:]
Mr. Nowlan:
It's all right.
I don't think it's
his heart's blood;
I think it's his
brains.
Mr. Bigg:
It will be a live
bomb next.
May 14, 1966, page 5266,
as the Hon J. R.
Nicholson was replying
to a question placed
on the Order Paper by
Mr. Frank Howard, about
the Seafarers International
Union:
"I presume that
technically the
hon. Member may
be entitled to communications
between other organizations."
[Editor's Note: At
this point a loud
explosion was heard
in the chamber]
Later at page 5268
at the start of
Oral Questions:
DEATH OF MAN IN BOMB
EXPLOSION
Right Hon J. G.
Diefenbaker
(Leader of the
Opposition):
Mr. Speaker, the
reason for the conversation
in the chamber is
the current report
that someone has
just passed away
in the precincts
of the House of
Commons. I suggest
to the Prime Minister,
and I do so in the
desire the house
should not be carrying
on under these circumstances,
that it might be
worth considering
that this house
should adjourn.
Right Hon. L.
B. Pearson (Prime
Minister): It
appears that there
was a bomb explosion
in the washroom
at the end of the
third floor and
that a man has been
killed. There has
been a good deal
of damage done to
the washroom and
a certain amount
of confusion is
natural. Perhaps
my right hon. friend's
suggestion should
be adopted and the
house could adjourn
until four o'clock,
when the situation
will be cleared
up and we can resume.
At 305 p.m. the sitting
was suspended.
The house resumed
at 4 p.m.
Mr. Frank Howard
(Skeena): It
may be early to
ask for a report,
but I wonder if
the Solicitor General
could report upon
or comment about
the events which
happened just prior
to the adjournment?
Hon. L. T. Pennell
(Solicitor General):
I have no statement
to make at this
time, Mr. Speaker.
I understand that
the R.C.M.P. and
the Ottawa city
police are co-operating
in this.
February 12, 1985, page
2254, as Mr. Dan
McKenzie was speaking
on a Supply Motion:
"The Hon. Member
said I used selective
figures. I would
like to have had
at least an hour-"
[Editor's Note: And
an object having
been thrown from
the gallery:]
Mr. Blaikie:
Mr. Speaker, I rise
on a point of order.
The Hon. Member
for Beaches (Mr.
Young) has just
been attacked from
the Gallery. Have
we got security
around here or not?
An. Hon. Member:
They have hustled
him out.
Mr. McKenzie:
That is somebody
expressing-
Mr. Blaikie:
If you think that
is funny, Dan, you
have another think
coming.
Mr. Young:
Shame on you, Dan.
June 1, 1987, page 6584,
as Mr. Bill Blaike
(Winnipeg-Bird's Hill)
was making a statement
on Environment Week:
"I call upon
the Minister of
the Environment
(Mr. McMillan) to
re-evaluate the
Environmental Protection
Act, the draft of
which he has already
put before the public
and of which he
intends to introduce
a second draft this
month. I call upon
him to respond to
the criticisms that
have been made of
the first draft.
"The Minister
and the Government
know-"
[Editor's Note: And
a stranger having
entered the Chamber,
addressed the Chair,
and been removed
by Assistant Deputy
Sergeant-at-Arms
Leo Robitaille:]
Mr. Speaker:
The Hon Member for
Winnipeg-Birds Hill.
Mr. Blaikie:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I did not mean to
get everybody so
excited.
This article has grown
to greater length than
originally planned but,
upon reflection, the
subject matter of parliamentary
security is of ever
growing importance in
a climate of increasing
terrorist threat, not
to mention the early
return to society of
persons unfortunately
suffering mental derangement.
The words of Mr. Bigg,
"Next time it will
be a bomb", carry
a sombre warning that
must be heeded. Non-reflective
sheathed glass panels
may provide an additional
measure of security.
The sheathing is manufactured
in Ottawa where Parliament
is situated.
The security of Members
of Parliament, their
staff, of officials,
and of the public should
be a matter of primary
importance. There have
been too many times
when security has failed.
The November 2002 gentleman
intruder was reported
as saying on national
television that he was
surprised at how easily
he could sneak into
a room full of dignitaries,
after first sitting
in one of the public
galleries overlooking
the Commons Chamber.
"Everything fell
into place," he
said.
One reason such events
as those recorded above
are lost in institutional
memory is the fairly
rapid turnover in membership
of the House of Commons.
It is calculated that
one average a third
of the membership disappears
with each General Election.
In recent times officials
too have appeared briefly
and disappeared without
trace. It is up to the
present members of the
House to ensure not
only their own security
but that of their successors
for generations to come.
--30--
Home
| About
| Canadian Vindicator
| Literature
| Gallery
| History
|