A Lesson in Voting
Two countries at opposite
ends the seesaw tottering
between democracy and
one-man, one-party rule,
provided a lesson last
month to Canada on how
to make sure that the
votes of an electorate
are clearly, fully,
accurately, and speedily
recorded and counted
in an election or referendum.
Iraq was one of them,
Ireland the other.
In Iraq it was a simple
process. There was only
one candidate. He received
100% of the votes cast.
And voting was mandatory.
There were no spoiled
votes.
In Ireland it was also
a simple process. There
were two choices. Accept
or reject full participation
in the European Union.
Acceptance would open
the way for ten other
countries, mainly former
members or satellites
of the Soviet Union,
to become members of
the European Union.
Two-thirds voted for
acceptance, one-third
for rejection. And voting
was not mandatory.
What made the Irish referendum
unique was that in seven
constituencies where
electronic voting took
place, not a single
ballot was spoiled.
There were no hanging
chads, no pregnant dimples,
no appeals for recounts.
The use of electronic
voting machines eliminated
the possibility that
voters could purposely
destroy their own ballots.
Even if they attempted
to do so by choosing
both options, yes and
no, the machines promptly
displayed an error message.
As a result, not a single
spoiled vote was recorded
in the 270,124 votes
tallied in the seven
selected constituencies.
Normally between 700
and 1,300 spoiled votes
could have been expected.
The lesson from Iraq
was that mandatory voting
works.
The lesson from Ireland
was that electronic
voting works.
Voting should be a mandatory
civic duty in Canada.
Electronic voting should
work successfully in
Canada.
For further reading see
Democracy
in Canada
--30--
Home
| About
| Canadian Vindicator
| Literature
| Gallery
| History
|